OK, so the way I understand it is that we are supposed to post something that we thing will go wrong in the future. Present reasons why, and then link it back to chapters 1-3. Here goes. . .
One of the problems my group discussed was the US taking steps to solve the Green Project. One thing that we are doing is the creation of hybrid cars. These cars run on less gas, electricity, heck, I even saw an advertisement for a car that will run on water. This last 'new development' is what I would like to address. We are already asked as a country to conserve water. We are asked to not water our lawns on extremely hot days, or even turning off our sprinklers during the rainy season- OK that one is just common sense, but I guess some people need reminders. Anyway, it would appear that we are not fixing the current problem but merely creating an new problem for future generations. And between you and me, which would you rather be without- oil (gas) or water? Thank you very much but I will keep my water please!
Now in reference to the readings, I believe that we can best address this topic by going back to the basics: in chapter on it gives the definition of organizational communication: interaction required to direct a group toward a set of common goals. We as a country are trying to reach a common goal but the mere definition of organizational comm. speaks volumes. We are simply going into many directions to effectively reach success.
To the girls who welcomed me into their group, if I have stepped on your toes in anyway I apologize and please feel free to add on to what I have already stated if need be.
Showing posts with label M Davis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label M Davis. Show all posts
Monday, October 15, 2007
Office Space
How closely do we listen to people we work with? And does it really matter?
The scene in which Peter is interviewed by Bob and Bob is a classic scene in which miscommunication occurs. Peter is factually telling the Bobs that he hates his job, does absolutely nothing and gives them enough information and grounds to fire him. However, they decide that Peter is one of the best employees there and instead of firing him they promote him. The irony of the situation is that his two best friends, who not only work, but work their butts off get fired. Do people really listen to the people they work with?- not as closely as they should. And does it really matter?- Absolutely! If a boss/auditor doesn't pay attention, who knows what kind of mistakes may occur.
Going against what was stated in chapter 2, "miscommunication and unintentional communication are to be expected" . . . but they shouldn't be the norm.
The scene in which Peter is interviewed by Bob and Bob is a classic scene in which miscommunication occurs. Peter is factually telling the Bobs that he hates his job, does absolutely nothing and gives them enough information and grounds to fire him. However, they decide that Peter is one of the best employees there and instead of firing him they promote him. The irony of the situation is that his two best friends, who not only work, but work their butts off get fired. Do people really listen to the people they work with?- not as closely as they should. And does it really matter?- Absolutely! If a boss/auditor doesn't pay attention, who knows what kind of mistakes may occur.
Going against what was stated in chapter 2, "miscommunication and unintentional communication are to be expected" . . . but they shouldn't be the norm.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)